Mia Galeotalanza wrote:Lex wrote:Because Linda and Gabriel are almost assuredly 100% with me, we're all great friends & they both put me down for #1 in the questionnaire challenge.
Okay, so just to grill you even more, are you saying that in this situation, friendship is more important than strategy? Is there ever any point where someone (including you) could say, "Well, I like this person a lot and I think we'll be great friends OUTSIDE of the game, but I'm here to win, so I have no problem cutting their throat in the name of strategy!"?
If this were Survivor for a $1 million prize, I'm sure I and others would not have many qualms backstabbing our "friends" if we thought we would end up winning the 1 million by doing so. However in an online game where there is not a prize, friendships are HUGE because "Even though voting out this guy is a good idea, he and I are great friends, ehh... nah I'll keep him", like J.T. in Tocantins. On the strategy/friendship continuum I am favoring towards the friendship side, but not all the way to the end where people want to get rid of you because literally EVERYBODY likes you like Eddie/Brenda in Caramoan. The reason for this is friendship COMPLIMENTS strategy in a HUGE manner that if you and your allies share an irrevocable bond, they will most likely NOT vote you out, whereas if you only shared a strategy-type bond, they will have NO problem voting you out, at all.
Strategy barely compliments friendship, if at all. Nobody liked Frank after the swap, even though he was a great strategical player, we had no problem voting him out because we didn't really like the way he treated everybody.