Kim J wrote:I'm going to give you each a paragraph of my opinion of you, and I really want you guys to correct me if I'm wrong. Furthermore, I want you guys to answer the questions of the paragraph in depth.
Gabe, first of all, congratulations on making it to the end. I'm impressed by the game you played, because it seems as though you had a calm, civil, and consistent approach to this game: something a lot of people did not do. However, it is very unlikely you will be receiving my vote. Lindsey and Linda have an advantage because they both know me a LOT better then I know you. Our relationship is nonexistent. That doesn't really bug me - sometimes, we don't have the ability to talk or we don't have the advantage of being on the same tribe premerge. What does bug me is the fact that you never tried to get to know me. I sent you several mails the night I was leaving, and you sent me literally one response to them: you said that you will talk to me later about the game. Later never came, Gabe. You left me hanging, and eventually, I left the game. As the other jurors joined me, and especially recently, I have come to realize that I'm not the only person that feels this way about you. 5/9ths of this jury has admitted to you hardly talking to them. The rest of the jury is nearly convinced that you played a stellar game, which brings me to my question. Explain how the way you played your game is worthy of the win? Gabe, my vote isn't finalized, but you need to REALLY convince me that you played a GREAT game despite your socially unacceptable approach to a majority of this jury. Thank you, and congrats.
Kim, I really am sorry that you feel I didn't make an effort, and a lot of that has to do with my intentions of the round that you left. Yes, I can admit that later never came, and that is partially my fault, but I honestly could not risk getting close to someone that was going to have the boot. You can ask Linda and Lindsey, I repeatedly told them to play smart, not with my heart, and I knew that you were someone that I was going to get extremely close to. I saw a lot of Patricia in you. The way you spoke and the way you joked around was something that was very appealing, and if our conversation had went longer, I knew it was going to hurt my game.
Along with that, the first two rounds of the merge were very busy rounds for me. Not in the game, but in general. I had plans for a lot of the time, leading me to miss the first immunity challenge, and most of the vote. I can sincerely apologize for the feelings that you and most of the jury have against me not making an effort to get close to you, but knowing that I'm an extremely emotional person, I couldn't let myself do that. I had to do what was in my best interest, and there were times where I couldn't stand up because I'd voted someone I cared for out of this game. See: Patricia. See: Lex.
I'm not 100% sure if you will read all of the opening statements or not, but I am sure and can say in confidence that the game I played
was great. Think about it. Was I never a target because I was playing bad? It might seem like that, but I voted for every single person in the majority out. I was never blindsided in this game, I never had a target until the final 4, and I played intelligently, instead of emotionally. I honestly could not risk getting close to people or else my game would've been destroyed. The people that put themselves out there and got close with people the most are the people that are in the jury. People like you, Patricia, Sean, Gina, Lex... They're all people who played an impeccable social game and it ended up hurting them. I couldn't risk doing that and it hurting me.