FTC Commentary

Jury Duty

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:35:31 am

Patricia wrote:Lindsey:

4. Compare each member of the jury to a Gym Leader from the pokemon games. Give reasoning.


This is a weird and creative question.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sean » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:35:37 am

I love you patricia. I knew there was a reason we got along so well.
User avatar
Sean
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:21 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:35:51 am

Patricia wrote:
Gabriel wrote:Outwit, outplay, outlast. Not outsocialize.

I was social enough to get me here, was I not? I think I was. I'm sorry that you have such a vendetta against me, Jury. And I'm sorry that you guys don't respect the game that I've played, but I sure as hell do and there's no way I'd be here if I'd played as socially as you guys wanted me to be.

I really think this is particularly potent.

Had he talked to me, it wouldn't have affected him getting to the finals. Making a deal with me, maybe. Voting with me, deffinately. But just talking to me has literally no affect on his final position.
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Gina » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:35:53 am

OMG Patty the Pokemon question is going to be amazing. <3
User avatar
Gina
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:19:51 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sean » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:36:08 am

great minds think alike.
User avatar
Sean
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:21 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:36:56 am

Sean wrote:I love you patricia. I knew there was a reason we got along so well.


Actually most of your questions are really strange and creative o_O wow.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:37:45 am

icon_biggrin Love you guys too icon_smile.

But seriously all of you check out that music video. Laff's to be had.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:39:59 am

That music video is scarring me for life ;-;
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sarah » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:40:09 am

Lex wrote:
Sean wrote:I love you patricia. I knew there was a reason we got along so well.


Actually most of your questions are really strange and creative o_O wow.

This is your first game, I can tell. I hope it's your last.
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:40:17 am

Fuck me I have an awful habit of putting apostrophes in words that don't need them. I can't help it
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:41:36 am

Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:
Sean wrote:I love you patricia. I knew there was a reason we got along so well.


Actually most of your questions are really strange and creative o_O wow.

This is your first game, I can tell. I hope it's your last.


This is actually NOT my first game, you're wrong. But your last sentence goes both ways.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:43:10 am

Linda's actually been very convincing this FTC. I don't know if it's just because of the questions being asked but Lindsey hasn't impressed me at all.

Gabe has pretty much said exactly what I expected him to say which is a good thing and a bad thing.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Gina » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:43:18 am

Ninja Sex Party in Ponderosa later?
User avatar
Gina
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:19:51 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:43:45 am

Lex wrote:
Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:
Sean wrote:I love you patricia. I knew there was a reason we got along so well.


Actually most of your questions are really strange and creative o_O wow.

This is your first game, I can tell. I hope it's your last.


This is actually NOT my first game, you're wrong. But your last sentence goes both ways.

It's almost a running joke how continuously and consistently wrong Sarah is. At all times.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:44:41 am

Gina wrote:Ninja Sex Party in Ponderosa later?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjs3flF-vQk

They don't end up going too well :(
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:46:28 am

Patricia wrote:Linda's actually been very convincing this FTC. I don't know if it's just because of the questions being asked but Lindsey hasn't impressed me at all.

Gabe has pretty much said exactly what I expected him to say which is a good thing and a bad thing.

I agree with Linda. Disagree with Lindsey, but a lot of what I'm hearing is also news to me.

Gabe impressed me with the question you asked him. Although, he ranked me INSANELY high on his conversationalist question. I think he's gunning to get my vote in FTC.
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:46:34 am

Very interesting pick by Gabe for the relationship. I personally would've gone Deena/Rob C since it's an almost perfect parallel but that's a good option too.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Clarence » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:47:00 am

THIS IS MY FIRST GAME. THAT'S WHY I SUCKED.
User avatar
Clarence
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:15:02 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:47:08 am

Kim J wrote:
Patricia wrote:Linda's actually been very convincing this FTC. I don't know if it's just because of the questions being asked but Lindsey hasn't impressed me at all.

Gabe has pretty much said exactly what I expected him to say which is a good thing and a bad thing.

I agree with Linda. Disagree with Lindsey, but a lot of what I'm hearing is also news to me.

Gabe impressed me with the question you asked him. Although, he ranked me INSANELY high on his conversationalist question. I think he's gunning to get my vote in FTC.


What he said is what I said earlier though, I said he didn't talk to you because he knew you were going to get voted out next and that's also what he said :o.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:48:08 am

Kim J wrote:
Patricia wrote:Linda's actually been very convincing this FTC. I don't know if it's just because of the questions being asked but Lindsey hasn't impressed me at all.

Gabe has pretty much said exactly what I expected him to say which is a good thing and a bad thing.

I agree with Linda. Disagree with Lindsey, but a lot of what I'm hearing is also news to me.

Gabe impressed me with the question you asked him. Although, he ranked me INSANELY high on his conversationalist question. I think he's gunning to get my vote in FTC.


He might've just been going off of potential good-conversation. he did say he saw you and I as similar which is strange considering our interactions on pondy so far but I guess this could always be a two-sides-of-the-same-coin deal.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

PreviousNext

Return to Ponderosa

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
cron