FTC Commentary

Jury Duty
Post a reply

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Clarence » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:52:33 am

Lex wrote:
Clarence wrote:Who do you guys think answered my questions epicly?


I think Lindsey said what everyone else pretty much said... but then again your questions were kind of weird and didn't allow for much wiggle room.


lol.

Well, fuck you, Lex!

Gina wrote:I mean, the image of Gabe standing on a bench with his arm to the sky is a little entertaining.

I think Lindsey mentioning that she was able to work into just about every alliance in the game is pretty accurate.

And I do think Linda was on point in that a lot of people perceived you as shady.


icon_drinks
User avatar
Clarence
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:15:02 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim P » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:52:48 am

Lex wrote:Kim you spelled "your" wrong, it's supposed to be "you're off the hook" not "your off the hook".

I'm terribly sorry Lex, terribly sorry.
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:54:50 am

ugh... you guys turned Linda into Sherri.

way to suck
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:54:57 am

Kim P wrote:
Lex wrote:Kim you spelled "your" wrong, it's supposed to be "you're off the hook" not "your off the hook".

I'm terribly sorry Lex, terribly sorry.


Apology accepted
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:55:57 am

Kim P wrote:Well Linda won't even respond so Mama Kim wanted me to know where you got your hat icon_lol


This isn't good sentence structure btw.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim P » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:56:06 am

Patricia wrote:ugh... you guys turned Linda into Sherri.

way to suck

I liked Sherri...
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:56:41 am

Kim P wrote:
Patricia wrote:ugh... you guys turned Linda into Sherri.

way to suck

I liked Sherri...


What....

how is this even possible
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:57:28 am

How do we tell Lindsey that chronologically her/his photo came before Rupert's sewing machine did with emoticons? o_o
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim P » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:57:42 am

Lex wrote:
Kim P wrote:
Patricia wrote:ugh... you guys turned Linda into Sherri.

way to suck

I liked Sherri...


What....

how is this even possible

Not in a serious way. She was just so lulzy.
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:58:28 am

Lex wrote:How do we tell Lindsey that chronologically her/his photo came before Rupert's sewing machine did with emoticons? o_o

It was a joke. Let her slide. It wasn't a serious question anyways
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:58:31 am

Kim P wrote:
Lex wrote:
Kim P wrote:
Patricia wrote:ugh... you guys turned Linda into Sherri.

way to suck

I liked Sherri...


What....

how is this even possible

Not in a serious way. She was just so lulzy.


To me Jean-Robert was more lulzy than Sherri, Sherri was boring.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:59:13 am

Kim J wrote:
Lex wrote:How do we tell Lindsey that chronologically her/his photo came before Rupert's sewing machine did with emoticons? o_o

It was a joke. Let her slide. It wasn't a serious question anyways


But... but... there must be an explanation for everything, or the world is illogical...
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sarah » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:00:38 am

God Lex, I see why you're a fucking alternate and not a first draft.
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:00:59 am

Oof, just when I thought Gabe was impressing me.

The fact that Lindsey didn't make any moves on you is the reason she shouldn't be the one to get your vote, in my eyes.

If anything, it proves that Lindsey upped her game after the blindside of an ally in order to make finals (and she is in finals, as we can all see)
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:02:32 am

Sarah wrote:God Lex, I see why you're a fucking alternate and not a first draft.


Can YOU say this to me and not realize how ironic this statement is? I only started correcting people's spelling after certain people in particular got mad at me for complaining about spelling.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Clarence » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:03:31 am

-Throws Jerri at Lex-
User avatar
Clarence
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:15:02 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:04:12 am

viewtopic.php?f=45&t=418&p=14883#p14880

I honestly wasn't expecting an impressive answer like that from him. Kim you should have at least asked Lindsey SOMETHING because Lindsey has nothing to talk to you about now. All of Gabe's points are valid. :/ You should have asked Lindsey the same question.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sarah » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:06:12 am

Lex wrote:http://venezuela.strandedgaming.com/ruins/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=418&p=14883#p14880

I honestly wasn't expecting an impressive answer like that from him. Kim you should have at least asked Lindsey SOMETHING because Lindsey has nothing to talk to you about now. All of Gabe's points are valid. :/ You should have asked Lindsey the same question.

That's not a good answer though tbh
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:06:36 am

Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:http://venezuela.strandedgaming.com/ruins/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=418&p=14883#p14880

I honestly wasn't expecting an impressive answer like that from him. Kim you should have at least asked Lindsey SOMETHING because Lindsey has nothing to talk to you about now. All of Gabe's points are valid. :/ You should have asked Lindsey the same question.

That's not a good answer though tbh


Are you kidding?
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am
Top

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim P » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:06:47 am

Don't worry! Gabe impressed me and he isn't out yet. Linda however refused to answer. So bye bye to her.
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply
Return to Ponderosa

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
cron