Kim J wrote:Jeff Probst wrote:Anyone else kinda bugged by Lex asking Gabe to redo the answers that the jury didn't like?
Yeah I noticed. Lex just wants to help Gabe win. It's adorable when men have crushes on each other.
Jeff Probst wrote:Anyone else kinda bugged by Lex asking Gabe to redo the answers that the jury didn't like?
Sarah wrote:Jeff Probst wrote:Anyone else kinda bugged by Lex asking Gabe to redo the answers that the jury didn't like?
Yes. I think he should be removed from the jury and Other Lex should vote.
Lex wrote:Jeff Probst wrote:Anyone else kinda bugged by Lex asking Gabe to redo the answers that the jury didn't like?
I am scrolling through what I said and I can't find ANYWHERE where I asked him to redo his answers. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Lex wrote:re·deem
/riˈdēm/
Verb
Compensate for the faults or bad aspects of (something): "a disappointing debate redeemed by an outstanding speech".
Do something that compensates for poor past performance or behavior.
Fair enough?
Kim J wrote:I disagree Jeff, now Gabe knows that something he said is wrong, and will correct it in the rebuttal.
What Lex did was immensely shady, and Lex, your playing favorites. I can't believe that at one point you accused me of not being open minded about this FTC.
Lex wrote:Kim J wrote:I disagree Jeff, now Gabe knows that something he said is wrong, and will correct it in the rebuttal.
What Lex did was immensely shady, and Lex, your playing favorites. I can't believe that at one point you accused me of not being open minded about this FTC.
I told EVERYBODY what I thought was the weak point of their winning case, Lindsey proved me wrong with her response and that was what I wanted them to do. I haven't really read Linda's response yet though.
Sarah wrote:Lex wrote:Kim J wrote:I disagree Jeff, now Gabe knows that something he said is wrong, and will correct it in the rebuttal.
What Lex did was immensely shady, and Lex, your playing favorites. I can't believe that at one point you accused me of not being open minded about this FTC.
I told EVERYBODY what I thought was the weak point of their winning case, Lindsey proved me wrong with her response and that was what I wanted them to do. I haven't really read Linda's response yet though.
But you're letting him know we aren't happy which isn't fair.
Jeff Probst wrote:Sorry Lex, I may have overreacted, I was just going to post that here but then I got complaints from the other hosts and had to do something about it in the actual tribal council thread. But either way, I didn't want the final 3 to know how the jury was reacting to their answers and I don't want him re-answering ones that he now knows were bad answers.
Either way, nothing has happened so don't sweat it :)
Sarah wrote:Lex wrote:Kim J wrote:I disagree Jeff, now Gabe knows that something he said is wrong, and will correct it in the rebuttal.
What Lex did was immensely shady, and Lex, your playing favorites. I can't believe that at one point you accused me of not being open minded about this FTC.
I told EVERYBODY what I thought was the weak point of their winning case, Lindsey proved me wrong with her response and that was what I wanted them to do. I haven't really read Linda's response yet though.
But you're letting him know we aren't happy which isn't fair.
Lex wrote:re·deem
/riˈdēm/
Verb
Compensate for the faults or bad aspects of (something): "a disappointing debate redeemed by an outstanding speech".
Do something that compensates for poor past performance or behavior.
Fair enough?
Holly Hoffman wrote:Lex wrote:re·deem
/riˈdēm/
Verb
Compensate for the faults or bad aspects of (something): "a disappointing debate redeemed by an outstanding speech".
Do something that compensates for poor past performance or behavior.
Fair enough?
an•noy•ing (əˈnɔɪ ɪŋ)
adj.
causing annoyance; irritatingly bothersome.