Winner Discussion Thread

Jury Duty

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim P » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:01:38 am

Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)

icon_lol
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Sarah » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:01:53 am

Patricia wrote:
Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.


You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.

their* icon_razz icon_lol icon_lol icon_lol icon_laughing icon_laughing icon_yes
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Vecepia » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:01:54 am

Wait, how many people don't know about the fake idols that essentially led to the first 4 jurors getting voted out and Sean becoming a power player?
User avatar
Vecepia
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:49 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Lex » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:02:58 am

Patricia wrote:
Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.


You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.


Oh god Pat, it's their* not they're.



Kim J wrote:
Lex wrote:There's a point in the game. where your allies become your enemies..


And Lindsey deduced that you and Linda were enemies more then allies. You consider that "manipulation", in the end, it's no different then Gabe.

Oh wait, there is a difference between Lindsey and Gabe! Lindsey actually GAVE A SHIT about this game.



You're assuming things now. Lindsey definitely manipulated me without a second thought, and he did something similar to Linda (who admittedly overreacted) too...
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim J » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:03:32 am

Lex wrote:
Kim J wrote:Lex I stated earlier to forgive me for my English mistakes, so...

No one has managed to defend the fact that Gabe ignored half of the people here today.



I don't deny that, but to me Gabe's strategy is just superior to Lindsey's even though his social game wasn't as good.

Read what Patricia said, it clarifies a lot of good points. I should go to bed, peace

Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.

That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim J » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:04:08 am

Lex wrote:
Patricia wrote:
Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.


You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.


Oh god Pat, it's their* not they're.



Kim J wrote:
Lex wrote:There's a point in the game. where your allies become your enemies..


And Lindsey deduced that you and Linda were enemies more then allies. You consider that "manipulation", in the end, it's no different then Gabe.

Oh wait, there is a difference between Lindsey and Gabe! Lindsey actually GAVE A SHIT about this game.

And Gabe didn't do that to his "biggest allies"?

You're assuming things now. Lindsey definitely manipulated me without a second thought, and he did something similar to Linda (who admittedly overreacted) too...
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Lex » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:04:26 am

Kim P wrote:
Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)

icon_lol


I'm not going to waste my time talking to you two, have better things to do... hope Gina reads this though

night
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Sarah » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:05:09 am

Lex wrote:
Kim P wrote:
Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)

icon_lol


I'm not going to waste my time talking to you two, have better things to do... hope Gina reads this though

night

Aww, come on Lex. It's just a joke.
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim P » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:05:17 am

Lex wrote:
Kim P wrote:
Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)

icon_lol


I'm not going to waste my time talking to you two, have better things to do... hope Gina reads this though

night

He has to go fight the evil in this world.
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Patricia » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:05:19 am

Kim J wrote:I'm making accusations based on proof Patty. Gabe ignored half of this jury. Why should that be rewarded?


But you have no proof. You have one round where one guy ignored you because you were going. Oh no. I'm not saying you have to vote Gabe, I'm reasonably sure you're not going to, but your incessant proclamations that he's awful and played a horrible game based on that one round of information I find incredibly stupid. Especially when you've been given accounts from 8 other people since, both for and against your own argument.

Don't reward Gabe ignoring half the jury. give him shit for it. But you should also praise him for all the good he did, and you should also take an equal look at Lindsey and ask "Why should I reward someone who for all intents and purposes had no impact on the votes of the game"

Linda has had more overall sway than Lindsey in terms of votes. Lindsey has been on a single track with her alliance post-merge of Gina/Sarah/Kimp/Gabe and I. Even when Gabe and I betrayed her, she still let Gabe continue to take out her allies one by one.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Lex » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:05:44 am

Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.

That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.


I can use the same argument, for me it's surprising you are willing to vote for someone who cruelly lied and manipulated many of the players in the game.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Patricia » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:06:21 am

Sarah wrote:
Patricia wrote:
Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.


You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.

their* icon_razz icon_lol icon_lol icon_lol icon_laughing icon_laughing icon_yes


I actually wrote half a sentence where 'they're' worked, then edited the end. Forgot to change the there/their/they're.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim P » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:07:56 am

Lex wrote:
Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.

That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.


I can use the same argument, for me it's surprising you are willing to vote for someone who cruelly lied and manipulated many of the players in the game.

Lex, how you don't realize how stupid that sounded? THIS ISN'T THE FUCKING 700 CLUB.
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim P » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:09:10 am

Damn it I did the same thing Patty did.
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim J » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:09:50 am

Patricia wrote:
Kim J wrote:I'm making accusations based on proof Patty. Gabe ignored half of this jury. Why should that be rewarded?


But you have no proof. You have one round where one guy ignored you because you were going. Oh no. I'm not saying you have to vote Gabe, I'm reasonably sure you're not going to, but your incessant proclamations that he's awful and played a horrible game based on that one round of information I find incredibly stupid. Especially when you've been given accounts from 8 other people since, both for and against your own argument.

Don't reward Gabe ignoring half the jury. give him shit for it. But you should also praise him for all the good he did, and you should also take an equal look at Lindsey and ask "Why should I reward someone who for all intents and purposes had no impact on the votes of the game"

Linda has had more overall sway than Lindsey in terms of votes. Lindsey has been on a single track with her alliance post-merge of Gina/Sarah/Kimp/Gabe and I. Even when Gabe and I betrayed her, she still let Gabe continue to take out her allies one by one.

I do have proof. I have 4/9 people agreeing that Gabe actively ignored them. Gina even stated that Lindsey played the better game, although she didn't say Gabe ignored her.
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Sarah » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:10:13 am

Lex, I'm sorry. It was an immature joke but I was only joking. I didn't mean to offend you. Honey wasn't meant with any malice. Also, I'd appreciate it if you didn't refer to me as he when I'm playing Sarah. Please treat it as if I was performing in drag. RuPaul is a he but RuPaul the Drag Queen is a she. Same principle here, please.
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim J » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:10:33 am

Lex wrote:
Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.

That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.


I can use the same argument, for me it's surprising you are willing to vote for someone who cruelly lied and manipulated many of the players in the game.

So in essence, your saying "I cant believe your voting for someone who played this game"?
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Kim P » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:12:10 am

Kim J wrote:
Lex wrote:
Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.

That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.


I can use the same argument, for me it's surprising you are willing to vote for someone who cruelly lied and manipulated many of the players in the game.

So in essence, your saying "I cant believe your voting for someone who played this game"?

I know right? Why vote for Lindsey when we can vote for someone who ignored half the cast and didn't do shit until the Final 10, where the only moves he made were betrayals!
User avatar
Kim P
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:53 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Patricia » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:12:11 am

Kim J wrote:
Patricia wrote:
Kim J wrote:I'm making accusations based on proof Patty. Gabe ignored half of this jury. Why should that be rewarded?


But you have no proof. You have one round where one guy ignored you because you were going. Oh no. I'm not saying you have to vote Gabe, I'm reasonably sure you're not going to, but your incessant proclamations that he's awful and played a horrible game based on that one round of information I find incredibly stupid. Especially when you've been given accounts from 8 other people since, both for and against your own argument.

Don't reward Gabe ignoring half the jury. give him shit for it. But you should also praise him for all the good he did, and you should also take an equal look at Lindsey and ask "Why should I reward someone who for all intents and purposes had no impact on the votes of the game"

Linda has had more overall sway than Lindsey in terms of votes. Lindsey has been on a single track with her alliance post-merge of Gina/Sarah/Kimp/Gabe and I. Even when Gabe and I betrayed her, she still let Gabe continue to take out her allies one by one.

I do have proof. I have 4/9 people agreeing that Gabe actively ignored them. Gina even stated that Lindsey played the better game, although she didn't say Gabe ignored her.

Sure, ignore everthing else I said. me saying "You have no proof" was in regard to you saying he's awful and played a horrible"

Do you have any valid points for everything else I said or are you going to stick to your "Gabe Ignored People" argument? I mean, I understand if that's literally the only validpoint you have that's anti-Gabe. but still.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: Winner Discussion Thread

Postby Sarah » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:13:20 am

Frank, can ya just wait until Monday to yell at Lex? What if the finalists see that and treat the responses differently?
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am

PreviousNext

Return to Ponderosa

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
cron