Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)

Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)
Patricia wrote:Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.
You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.
Patricia wrote:Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.
You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.
Kim J wrote:Lex wrote:There's a point in the game. where your allies become your enemies..
And Lindsey deduced that you and Linda were enemies more then allies. You consider that "manipulation", in the end, it's no different then Gabe.
Oh wait, there is a difference between Lindsey and Gabe! Lindsey actually GAVE A SHIT about this game.
Lex wrote:Kim J wrote:Lex I stated earlier to forgive me for my English mistakes, so...
No one has managed to defend the fact that Gabe ignored half of the people here today.
I don't deny that, but to me Gabe's strategy is just superior to Lindsey's even though his social game wasn't as good.
Read what Patricia said, it clarifies a lot of good points. I should go to bed, peace
Lex wrote:Patricia wrote:Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.
You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.
Oh god Pat, it's their* not they're.Kim J wrote:Lex wrote:There's a point in the game. where your allies become your enemies..
And Lindsey deduced that you and Linda were enemies more then allies. You consider that "manipulation", in the end, it's no different then Gabe.
Oh wait, there is a difference between Lindsey and Gabe! Lindsey actually GAVE A SHIT about this game.
And Gabe didn't do that to his "biggest allies"?
You're assuming things now. Lindsey definitely manipulated me without a second thought, and he did something similar to Linda (who admittedly overreacted) too...
Kim P wrote:Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)
Lex wrote:Kim P wrote:Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)
I'm not going to waste my time talking to you two, have better things to do... hope Gina reads this though
night
Lex wrote:Kim P wrote:Sarah wrote:Honey is derogatory? I'd hate to know what would happen if I called you Lexicunt. (Get it because you're correcting spelling and grammar)
I'm not going to waste my time talking to you two, have better things to do... hope Gina reads this though
night
Kim J wrote:I'm making accusations based on proof Patty. Gabe ignored half of this jury. Why should that be rewarded?
Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.
That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.
Sarah wrote:Patricia wrote:Sarah wrote:You know you've lost when you have to stoop to correcting spelling in an argument.
You know you've lost when you ignore several other points and only rebut they're (admittedly childish) correction of spelling.
their*![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lex wrote:Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.
That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.
I can use the same argument, for me it's surprising you are willing to vote for someone who cruelly lied and manipulated many of the players in the game.
Patricia wrote:Kim J wrote:I'm making accusations based on proof Patty. Gabe ignored half of this jury. Why should that be rewarded?
But you have no proof. You have one round where one guy ignored you because you were going. Oh no. I'm not saying you have to vote Gabe, I'm reasonably sure you're not going to, but your incessant proclamations that he's awful and played a horrible game based on that one round of information I find incredibly stupid. Especially when you've been given accounts from 8 other people since, both for and against your own argument.
Don't reward Gabe ignoring half the jury. give him shit for it. But you should also praise him for all the good he did, and you should also take an equal look at Lindsey and ask "Why should I reward someone who for all intents and purposes had no impact on the votes of the game"
Linda has had more overall sway than Lindsey in terms of votes. Lindsey has been on a single track with her alliance post-merge of Gina/Sarah/Kimp/Gabe and I. Even when Gabe and I betrayed her, she still let Gabe continue to take out her allies one by one.
Lex wrote:Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.
That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.
I can use the same argument, for me it's surprising you are willing to vote for someone who cruelly lied and manipulated many of the players in the game.
Kim J wrote:Lex wrote:Kim J wrote:Alright fair enough. You can vote for Gabe, it really doesn't affect me. I'm just surprised that as a survivor fan, you can willingly vote for someone who didn't talk to half of this jury.
That's the main reason why Gabe is losing. And I want him to learn a lesson after FTC.
I can use the same argument, for me it's surprising you are willing to vote for someone who cruelly lied and manipulated many of the players in the game.
So in essence, your saying "I cant believe your voting for someone who played this game"?
Kim J wrote:Patricia wrote:Kim J wrote:I'm making accusations based on proof Patty. Gabe ignored half of this jury. Why should that be rewarded?
But you have no proof. You have one round where one guy ignored you because you were going. Oh no. I'm not saying you have to vote Gabe, I'm reasonably sure you're not going to, but your incessant proclamations that he's awful and played a horrible game based on that one round of information I find incredibly stupid. Especially when you've been given accounts from 8 other people since, both for and against your own argument.
Don't reward Gabe ignoring half the jury. give him shit for it. But you should also praise him for all the good he did, and you should also take an equal look at Lindsey and ask "Why should I reward someone who for all intents and purposes had no impact on the votes of the game"
Linda has had more overall sway than Lindsey in terms of votes. Lindsey has been on a single track with her alliance post-merge of Gina/Sarah/Kimp/Gabe and I. Even when Gabe and I betrayed her, she still let Gabe continue to take out her allies one by one.
I do have proof. I have 4/9 people agreeing that Gabe actively ignored them. Gina even stated that Lindsey played the better game, although she didn't say Gabe ignored her.