FTC Commentary

Jury Duty

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sarah » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:19:59 am

Lex wrote:
Sarah wrote:Keep your answers short and brief so you can see my questions, I'll be asking random extra questions through out.



icon_unsure

GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU FUCKING ALTERNATE. YOU'RE A WASTE OF SPACE.
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Vecepia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:20:53 am

Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:
Sarah wrote:Keep your answers short and brief so you can see my questions, I'll be asking random extra questions through out.



icon_unsure

GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU FUCKING ALTERNATE. YOU'RE A WASTE OF SPACE.

Back off from my BroLex.
User avatar
Vecepia
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:49 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:21:00 am

Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:
Sarah wrote:Keep your answers short and brief so you can see my questions, I'll be asking random extra questions through out.



icon_unsure

GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU FUCKING ALTERNATE. YOU'RE A WASTE OF SPACE.


Considering what it entailed, you really made the perfect Cacique.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sean » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:21:17 am

hahhaha we are Lex, we are.

she did yours too Kim?
User avatar
Sean
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:21 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Vecepia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:21:37 am

Patricia wrote:
Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:
Sarah wrote:Keep your answers short and brief so you can see my questions, I'll be asking random extra questions through out.



icon_unsure

GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU FUCKING ALTERNATE. YOU'RE A WASTE OF SPACE.


Considering what it entailed, you really made the perfect Cacique.

I never should have suggested her....
User avatar
Vecepia
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:49 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:23:08 am

Sean wrote:hahhaha we are Lex, we are.

she did yours too Kim?

She actually did. Just two corrections, but she told me that if i wanted to keep my gonads, I should have it spot-free before Lex gets a-hold of it XD
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sean » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:23:56 am

hahahah Vee, i remember that first day real well. I was in denial that she was a evil queen for the first few tribals until i got sent over. Then when i became Cacique and learned the twist and forgave her, but then i relized that she was really just an evil queen.

<3 you Sarah
User avatar
Sean
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:21 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sean » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:24:21 am

Kim J wrote:
Sean wrote:hahhaha we are Lex, we are.

she did yours too Kim?

She actually did. Just two corrections, but she told me that if i wanted to keep my gonads, I should have it spot-free before Lex gets a-hold of it XD



haha same.
User avatar
Sean
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:21 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sean » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:24:34 am

well in different words i guess....
User avatar
Sean
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:21 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:25:20 am

Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:
Sarah wrote:Keep your answers short and brief so you can see my questions, I'll be asking random extra questions through out.



icon_unsure

GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU FUCKING ALTERNATE. YOU'RE A WASTE OF SPACE.


Whoa bro...


Sean wrote:hahhaha we are Lex, we are.


icon_wub

Sean wrote:
Kim J wrote:
Sean wrote:hahhaha we are Lex, we are.

she did yours too Kim?

She actually did. Just two corrections, but she told me that if i wanted to keep my gonads, I should have it spot-free before Lex gets a-hold of it XD



haha same.


I love Brenda hahaha.
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:26:55 am

"I'm not here because there were bigger fish to fry. I may be the luckiest one here (a notion I don't disagree with but I do think I shouldn't have held against me - luck is a crucial part of any Survivor season) but I didn't let the game happen to me. After Kim P left, I made a deal with Sean to watch out for each other because I wasn't content being a sitting duck - and if Pat/Gabe lied that round again, I needed a back-up plan. I was always thinking ahead and planning ahead, and never gave up when things weren't going my way."

I no longer have any reason to not vote for Lindsey. My vote is more then sealed, unless something DRASTIC happens. Last minute twists, Jeff?
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Patricia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:28:15 am

Gabriel wrote:Outwit, outplay, outlast. Not outsocialize.

I was social enough to get me here, was I not? I think I was. I'm sorry that you have such a vendetta against me, Jury. And I'm sorry that you guys don't respect the game that I've played, but I sure as hell do and there's no way I'd be here if I'd played as socially as you guys wanted me to be.

I really think this is particularly potent.
User avatar
Patricia
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:20:36 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:29:09 am

Gabriel wrote:I'm not doing the bootlist because I got exactly who I wanted in the final 3 there, and everyone else is who I wanted out.


I amazingly disagree with this statement. Maybe at final 5, this is who he wanted in the final three, but I think that this wasn't planned for him THE WHOLE GAME. I seriously doubt this.
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sean » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:29:44 am

Patricia wrote:
Gabriel wrote:Outwit, outplay, outlast. Not outsocialize.

I was social enough to get me here, was I not? I think I was. I'm sorry that you have such a vendetta against me, Jury. And I'm sorry that you guys don't respect the game that I've played, but I sure as hell do and there's no way I'd be here if I'd played as socially as you guys wanted me to be.

I really think this is particularly potent.


icon_yes
User avatar
Sean
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22:21 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:29:53 am

Sarah wrote:
Lex wrote:
Sarah wrote:
The Fabulous Queen Cleopatra is back to name a winner and y'all better bow to the queen. This game ism't about any of you at this point, it's about me! You guys did okay but I mean I think we all know I should have been there. I don't care about none of you! XOXO. Alright! Let's move onto you guys, shall we?



icon_unsure icon_unsure icon_unsure icon_wacko icon_wacko icon_wacko icon_wacko icon_yawn icon_yawn icon_yawn icon_huh icon_yawn icon_no

icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes icon_rolleyes

GET THE FUCK OUT.


I'm dying icon_laughing
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Clarence » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:32:32 am

Kim J wrote:
Gabriel wrote:I'm not doing the bootlist because I got exactly who I wanted in the final 3 there, and everyone else is who I wanted out.


I amazingly disagree with this statement. Maybe at final 5, this is who he wanted in the final three, but I think that this wasn't planned for him THE WHOLE GAME. I seriously doubt this.


It could be. The day we merged I had my final five hopes planned out to be: Vecepia/Gabe/Linda/Lindsey with Linda and Lindsey going 5th and 4th for an easy for me. icon_laughing icon_lol icon_chaos icon_no

So, Gabe could have planned the same too... never know!
User avatar
Clarence
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:15:02 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Sarah » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:33:02 am

Gabriel isn't doing a good job of swaying the votes from Lindsey to him.
User avatar
Sarah
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:21:39 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Lex » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:33:55 am

I was pushing against Lindsey in the F3 because I knew she'd get votes because of her social game and I tried hard to get them to realize that. Although I guess, considering the F7, Lindsey was the least-threat there.. except maybe me
User avatar
Lex
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:17:15 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Kim J » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:34:16 am

Clarence wrote:
Kim J wrote:
Gabriel wrote:I'm not doing the bootlist because I got exactly who I wanted in the final 3 there, and everyone else is who I wanted out.


I amazingly disagree with this statement. Maybe at final 5, this is who he wanted in the final three, but I think that this wasn't planned for him THE WHOLE GAME. I seriously doubt this.


It could be. The day we merged I had my final five hopes planned out to be: Vecepia/Gabe/Linda/Lindsey with Linda and Lindsey going 5th and 4th for an easy for me. icon_laughing icon_lol icon_chaos icon_no

So, Gabe could have planned the same too... never know!

I seriously doubt it. He didn't even know Linda untill merge!
User avatar
Kim J
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:16:20 am

Re: FTC Commentary

Postby Gina » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:34:36 am

I don't know what else I can say other than why I didn't get as close to people as I did. Lindsey and Linda did and they nearly got ruined for it.

Ugh.


But they didn't.
User avatar
Gina
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:19:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to Ponderosa

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
cron